Evaluating Causal Effect Predictiveness of Candidate Surrogate Endpoints
نویسندگان
چکیده
Frangakis and Rubin (2002, Biometrics) proposed a new definition of a surrogate endpoint (a “principal” surrogate) based on causal effects. We introduce an estimand for evaluating a principal surrogate, the causal effect predictiveness (CEP) surface, which quantifies how well causal treatment effects on the biomarker predict causal treatment effects on the clinical endpoint. While the CEP surface is not identifiable due to missing potential outcomes, it can be identified by incorporating a baseline covariate that predicts the biomarker. Given case-cohort sampling of such a baseline predictor and the biomarker in a single large blinded randomized clinical trial, we develop an estimated likelihood method for estimating the CEP surface. This estimation assesses the “surrogate value” of the biomarker for reliably predicting clinical treatment effects for the same or similar setting as the trial. A CEP surface plot provides a way to compare the surrogate value of multiple biomarkers. The approach is illustrated by the problem of assessing an immune response to a vaccine as a surrogate endpoint for infection.
منابع مشابه
Evaluating candidate principal surrogate endpoints.
SUMMARY Frangakis and Rubin (2002, Biometrics 58, 21-29) proposed a new definition of a surrogate endpoint (a "principal" surrogate) based on causal effects. We introduce an estimand for evaluating a principal surrogate, the causal effect predictiveness (CEP) surface, which quantifies how well causal treatment effects on the biomarker predict causal treatment effects on the clinical endpoint. A...
متن کاملCommentary on "Principal stratification - a goal or a tool?" by Judea Pearl.
This commentary takes up Pearl's welcome challenge to clearly articulate the scientific value of principal stratification estimands that we and colleagues have investigated, in the area of randomized placebo-controlled preventive vaccine efficacy trials, especially trials of HIV vaccines. After briefly arguing that certain principal stratification estimands for studying vaccine effects on post-...
متن کاملSurrogate Endpoint Evaluation: Principal Stratification Criteria and the Prentice Definition.
A common problem of interest within a randomized clinical trial is the evaluation of an inexpensive response endpoint as a valid surrogate endpoint for a clinical endpoint, where a chief purpose of a valid surrogate is to provide a way to make correct inferences on clinical treatment effects in future studies without needing to collect the clinical endpoint data. Within the principal stratifica...
متن کاملTitle Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trials
May 15, 2015 Type Package Title Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trials Version 0.1-6 Date 2015-05-14 Author Wim Van der Elst, Ariel Alonso & Geert Molenberghs Maintainer Wim Van der Elst Description In a clinical trial, it frequently occurs that the most credible outcome to evaluate the effectiveness of a new therapy (the true endpoint) is difficult to m...
متن کاملDesign and estimation for evaluating principal surrogate markers in vaccine trials.
In vaccine research, immune biomarkers that can reliably predict a vaccine's effect on the clinical endpoint (i.e., surrogate markers) are important tools for guiding vaccine development. This article addresses issues on optimizing two-phase sampling study design for evaluating surrogate markers in a principal surrogate framework, motivated by the design of a future HIV vaccine trial. To addres...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007